11.
Statement made by Mr. F. S. Harrison on the 22nd March, Statement made by Mrs. Evans on the 22nd March. Some notes on the case by the Attorney General. Hongkong Weekly Press of the 25th March. (This report
is fragmentary and often inaccurate, but it may be referred to by the petitioner).
I also enclose one set of the photographs referred to in
the evidence,
5.
I attach great importance to this case because undoubtedly the murder was committed as part of the
policy of intimidation which was such a serious feature of the recent seamen's strike, and which was a direct challenge to all Government authority. The Chinese are peculiarly susceptible to methods of intimidation, and, whatever protection can be afforded within the Colony to persons who would wish to resist such methods, no protection can be
given by this Government to the families of such persons in
China, This reason for submission to the threats of the
organisers of the strike was actually given in some cases. The effect of the intimidation was widespread, and there is
little doubt that it was on intimidation and not on any
economic propaganda that the leaders of the strike mainly relied. Some seamen who were forced out by threats 'stated
that they had no grievance whatever against their employers,
and in the early stages many seamen seemed to know little about the Seamen's Union. The majority of the domestic servants were probably moved much more by fear than by sympathy in their "sympathetic" strike. The intimidation was so serious that it was quite impossible to obtain any evidence of it for the purposes of prosecution.
6. In the particular case now in question the
deceased had been threatened and he quite expected an attempt on his life. He was the manager of a firm of stevedores who had acted as stevedores for certain ships which sailed during the strike. He had been the means of
stopping
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.